Events
Join us!
Donate
Donate Now!
Contacts
Learn How
Subscribe
Learn How
«

The North American grasslands, or Great Plains, extend from Mexico, across the U.S., and into the three Canadian prairie provinces.

The northern portion of this vast ecoregion is referred to as the Northern Great Plains and covers more than 720,000 km2, sweeping across five states and two provinces: Alberta and Saskatchewan. AWA’s vision for the grasslands is to conserve the full biodiversity of the grassland natural region and establish large contiguous areas of native grassland that are protected in perpetuity both for their intrinsic value and for the benefit of present and future generations.

    • Introduction
    • Concerns
    • Features
    • History
    • Archive
    • Other Areas
    The Northern Great Plains Ecoregion - credit: WWF

    The Northern Great Plains Ecoregion – credit: WWF

    Because temperate grasslands are particularly suitable for agriculture, an estimated 99 percent of the non-urban grassland landscape is either under cultivation or livestock grazing. An estimated 57 percent of the Northern Great Plains remains untilled. Only about 1.5 percent of the Northern Great Plains is located in protected areas such as parks and reserves – less than any of the 13 other terrestrial global biomes, which average 7 percent. No protected area anywhere in the North American Great Plains has restored the full complement of native species and ecological processes,and unfortunately, this is not a management goal for any Great Plains protected areas.
    In Alberta, the Northern Great Plains in the southeast give way to the foothills fescue grasslands to the west and the northern fescue grasslands and aspen parkland to the north and northwest. Although it is facing enormous threats, Alberta’s prairie region contains some of the world’s best and most important remaining grassland. Only Texas and North Dakota retain a larger native prairie land base than Alberta. But today less than 1 percent of Alberta’s Grassland Natural Region is protected.

    A mere 150 years ago, tens of millions of bison, elk, pronghorn, and mule deer, thousands of birds and waterfowl, and many other wildlife species shared the prairies with wolves, grizzly bears, and other predators. Glacial landforms, permanent and intermittent wetlands, badlands, sand dunes, and river valleys with coulees, ravines, and cottonwood forests created a diverse landscape. Spear grass, June grass, wheat grass, oat grass, blue grama, and rough fescue covered the land from horizon to horizon.

    Prairie Coulees, Suffield NWA

    Prairie Coulees, Suffield National Wildlife Area (N. Douglas)

    The sad story of the decline of that rich landscape includes the displacement of wildlife, native plants, and First Nations people. Settlement, industry, and agriculture have had a devastating effect on wildlife, wild waters, and natural ecosystems. The grasslands region is now considered one of the most threatened ecosystems in North America. Most of the non-urban landscape of this region is either farmed or grazed by domestic cattle, with the additional threat of oil and gas development and its concomitant infrastructure of roads, well sites, and pipelines. Extensive fragmentation, invasion of non-native species, and loss of habitat is reflected in the number of endangered and at-risk grassland species in the southeastern corner of Alberta.
    In the midst of the overwhelming threats to this endangered ecosystem, there is good news: provincial, national and international initiatives to protect grassland species through conservation of their habitat are moving forward. Governments at all levels have recognized the importance of our grassland heritage, rural economies are needing and seeking renewal, conservation easements are increasingly popular, and much scientific research has been completed.

    “The prognosis for survival of the remaining native grasslands in prairie Canada is poor. Range ecologist Robert Coupland recently calculated that the Canadian prairie is one of the most intensively developed landscapes in the world.” – Environment Canada Website

    Vision

    AWA’s vision for the grasslands is to conserve the full biodiversity of the grassland natural region and establish large contiguous areas of native grassland that are protected in perpetuity both for their intrinsic value and for the benefit of present and future generations.

    Our goals are:

    • To work at both public policy and grassroots levels.
    • To encourage an informed and active public; to provide a strong base of easily accessible, historical and current public information on Alberta’s areas of concern.
    • To create a network of colleagues, experts, and local citizens to encourage conservation and awareness of new economic opportunities.
    • To promote ecosystem management and restoration of grassland and parkland ecosystems, including river basins.
    • To promote the establishment of a core protected areas network.
    South Saskatchewan River

    South Saskatchewan River (A. Teucher)

    “Presently in Alberta only 10 million acres [40,470 km2] of the 23 million acres comprising the Grassland Natural Region remain in a native state. Of the remaining prairie, 40 percent of the native vegetation land base is private land, with the rest in Crown ownership. According to the Alberta Prairie Conservation Forum, Alberta has experienced significant losses of important native prairie habitat. The majority of the native prairie landscape has been transformed by agriculture, industrial development and urbanization. Seventy-three percent of Alberta’s ‘at risk’ wildlife species rely on native prairie habitats.”
    – Alberta Fish and Game Press Release, December 1, 2004

    The government continues to sell native prairie for cultivation, allows increasing oil and gas operations and other industry to continue to fragment the region, resists formally protecting additional areas, and does a poor job at protecting those areas that are protected by allowing industrial activity to continue. Alberta’s grasslands have been increasingly altered and destroyed through sod-busting, invasive species, poor grazing practices, climate change, industrial agriculture, roads and other linear disturbances, and oil and gas. Wind farms and coalbed methane are more recent threats. The central parkland region has only remnants of native vegetation left with only a few opportunities for extensive protected areas.

    Issues

    Key issues affecting the Grassland Natural Region at this time are the following:
    In the Northern Great Plains generally, including Alberta:

    • Large oil and gas reserves exist in the grasslands of Alberta and Saskatchewan. As of 2003, there were 104,000 active oil and gas wells in the Canadian prairies. Oil and gas activity and coalbed methane development continue at a rapid pace.
    • The plains bison, once a keystone species of the grasslands, is for all practical purposes ecologically extinct. Of the 500,000 now in existence in North America, only 4 percent (about 19,000) are in conservation herds. None of the Great Plains herds are free-ranging. The long-term viability of these herds is compromised by small herd size, non-native diseases, unnatural culling practices, cattle gene introgression, and lack of a coordinated management strategy, among other factors.
    • The black-tailed prairie dog, another Great Plains keystone species, has been reduced to less than 2 percent of its former range. In the U.S., it continues to be shot, poisoned, and hunted for recreation.
    • The black-footed ferret, North America’s most endangered mammal, is found only in the Great Plains and now numbers approximately 400 animals in the wild. Sylvatic plague, introduced from Asia, threatens both prairie dogs and ferrets.
    • Grassland birds are undergoing greater and more widespread decline than any other ecological guild of North American birds.
    • Alteration of grassland fire regimes has had large-scale effects.
    • Dams, irrigation, and other water diversions threaten rivers and streams.
    • Non-native plant species (and non-native diseases) are invading the remaining native prairie landscapes.
    • Roads and other linear disturbances continue to be constructed, fragmenting prairie ecosystems.
    • Climate change has been identified as one of the key impacts to prairie biodiversity. A gradual reduction of tree and shrub cover is predicted, along with a decrease in mid-grasses and an increase in short-grasses.

    In Alberta:

    • The current ongoing transfer, with no public involvement, of the public lands referred to as Tax Recovery Lands to municipal districts. This is resulting in the privatization of great tracts of native prairie.
    • Possible dam development on the Milk River within the Twin River Heritage Rangeland Natural Area.
    • EnCana’s proposal to drill 1,275 gas wells and associated infrastructure, including 22km of pipeline, in the Suffield National Wildlife Area, which was designated in 2003.
    • A proposal to develop wind energy projects in a buffer zone around Cypress Hills Provincial Park that was designated by the county for native rangeland preservation.
    • The proposed 24-hour opening of the Wild Horse Border Crossing, with the associated proposal that Highway 41 become a major transportation corridor to the oil sands.
    • Sale of native prairie public lands without broad public knowledge and without commitment to the preservation of high conservation value native prairie.
    • The Alberta government’s request to reintroduce the sale to end-users of 2 percent liquid strychnine after a 17-year ban due to concerns about human health and the incidental poisoning of domestic animals and at-risk species.
    Windmill in Milk River Ridge

    Windmill in Milk River Ridge (S. Bray)

    Opportunities

    In 2005, 16 bison were released in Montana’s high plains to roam wild as their ancestors did over a hundred years ago. With two more releases as well as the birth of calves, that herd totals 76 healthy bison (2009). Seventy bison were released in 2006 in Saskatchewan’s Grasslands National Park where bison had not roamed for about 150 years. The release of these wild bison into native prairie is part of a vision that has grown over the past two decades: to restore large portions of the Northern Great Plains to their former beauty and ecological integrity.

    Human communities of the Northern Great Plains are also at an ecological and economic crossroads. Drought, faltering agricultural commodities in the global market, and declining income are rapidly changing human demographic patterns in the area. As this socioeconomic transformation occurs, there is an opportunity to re-vision what the region can become. We can begin by rebuilding the biotic integrity of the grasslands while creating a more diversified and sustainable economic base for the region. Several studies have demonstrated that communities located near natural areas offering diverse outdoor recreational activities are more robust economically than communities that are not.

    What is Needed?

    The IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) promotes the establishment and effective management of a worldwide, representative network of protected areas. It recognizes that terrestrial grasslands are among the most diverse and productive of the earth’s biomes, yet have received very low levels of protection. With the population expansion and the rapid rate of industrial development in Alberta, the urgency of protecting and restoring the richness and diversity of our ocean of grass has never been greater. We know what is needed – now is the time for action.

    Establishing protected areas is central to conservation efforts, but surrounding buffer areas must also be maintained. Protected areas must be of sufficient size to allow for viable wildlife populations, and secure wildlife corridors must connect protected areas for the purposes of migration and population dispersal. Some of the longest reaches of undammed rivers in North America exist in the Northern Great Plains, providing opportunities to conserve representative habitat for fish and other aquatic and riparian species.

    In Alberta, only 1 percent of the grasslands has been protected and the government aims to protect a mere 2.3 percent. This is a far cry from the 12 percent suggested by WWF’s Endangered Spaces program, and it also falls far short of the 8 percent of the Grasslands Region identified as priority lands by a provincial Special Places report.

    What AWA is Doing

    AWA has worked for many years to secure protection of public lands where specific conservation goals can be achieved. Conservancy organizations have worked hard at establishing conservation easements on deeded lands, helping to reduce fragmentation of habitat by filling in gaps public land does not cover.

    AWA Areas of Concern Within Grassland and Parkland Natural Regions

    • Grassland natural region (96,425km2)
      • Dry Mixedgrass and Mixedgrass subregions
        • Majorville
        • Milk River Ridge
        • Red Deer River
        • Bow River
        • Oldman River
        • Milk River – Sage Creek
        • Pakowki Lake
        • Cypress Hills
        • Middle Sand Hills (including the CFB Suffield National Wildlife Area)
      • Northern Fescue subregion
        • Rumsey Natural Area
        • Kirkpatrick Prairie
        • Hand Hills
      • Foothills Fescue subregion
        • Milk River Ridge
    • Central Parkland natural region (53,413 km2)
      • Rumsey Ecological Reserve
      • Parkland Dunes
      • Bodo Hills

    In a 1998 issue of Parks on the IUCN Grasslands Protected Areas program, Bill Henwood of Parks Canada, noted that temperate grasslands have long awaited their due recognition as valuable habitats worthy of protection and that many initiatives and programs indicated this emerging recognition. However, these initiatives often fail to address many grassland and parkland concerns and threats on the ground; these require local groups and citizens to take action, a role for which AWA is particularly suited.

    Sunset over Milk River Canyon

    Sunset over Milk River canyon (C. Wallis)

    Conservation Initiatives

    • Prairie Conservation Forum (PCF)

    AWA is one of 40 members of the PCF which was formed in 1989 to implement the Prairie Conservation Action Plan (PCAP), a World Wildlife Fund five-year strategy to influence policy and attitudes for conserving, protecting and managing native prairie and parkland species, communities and habitats in Canada’s three prairie provinces.

    Successive five-year plans have been prepared based on a vision to ensure the conservation of native prairie, the recognition of its intrinsic values and its benefits for human communities, and a mandate to encourage local community involvement and ensure all stakeholders work cooperatively to achieve conservation objectives.

    The PCF’s goals are to raise public awareness and information about management issues pertaining to prairie and parkland landscapes, habitats and species; develop and implement broad conservation strategies and focused initiatives; influence government policies, programs and regulations that favour the conservation while preserving cultural and economic values; and adopt land-use management practices and protective strategies that sustain diverse ecosystems across the whole prairie and parkland landscape.

    Because the PCF is not advocacy-based, the membership and involvement of AWA and other conservation groups with PCF is vital.

    For more information, go to www.albertapcf.org.

    Northern Plains Conservation Network (NPCN)

    AWA joined with other grassroots, regional, and national conservation organizations in 2000 to form the NPCN in order to chart a future that integrates conservation with the renewal of the human communities and economy of the Northern Great Plain. The goal is to develop a vision and conservation plan for the Northern Great Plains to address the challenge of biodiversity conservation in the context of sweeping socioeconomic changes.

    “Our premise is that there is power in working with, rather than against, the natural processes that shaped the plants and animals attuned to this landscape.” (NPCN News Release, Feb. 27, 2004)

    Among NPCN’s principles for conservation efforts are promotion of sound stewardship of public and private lands, recognition of the cultural importance of land and wildlife for many people, the benefits of conservation for local communities and economies, and the importance of partnerships between conservationists and local communities.

    Short-term efforts to improve the conservation landscape include the following:

    • Expanding the amount of land designated as reserves or managed primarily for biodiversity conservation.
    • Promoting ecologically sustainable management in both the agricultural and non-agricultural portions of the landscape that prevents further loss of native prairie, limits spread of non-native species, and leads to widespread adoption of grazing practices that restore and maintain native prairie habitats and species diversity.
    • Restoring populations of native species and securing their long-term viability, including restoration of ecologically functional populations of bison.
    • Ensuring that flows in the Missouri River system and its significant tributaries, including the Milk River, can support the full complement of aquatic and riparian species.

    Commission on Environmental Cooperation (CEC)

    AWA has participated in CEC’s tri-national meetings on grasslands to develop a shared vision and North American Grassland Strategy for the conservation and sustainable use of grasslands. There are species that are common to and move between Canada, the U.S., and Mexico. The goal is to sustain the ecological integrity and viability of grassland landscapes in North America by aligning relevant environmental, economic, and cultural values and activities. This includes:

    • promoting habitat conservation and management activities that foster prevention and reversal of declines and restoration of species and habitats;
    • encouraging the minimization of human disturbances;
    • encouraging the creation of markets for environmentally produced agricultural goods;
    • facilitating improved laws, regulations, policies, and programs favouring grassland conservation;
    • supporting ecosystem restoration of degraded grasslands;
    • increasing awareness of the worth of the environmental services provided by grasslands;
    • promoting the efforts of landowners/managers who conserve grasslands;
    • promoting consistent long-term monitoring techniques and research, and a common terminology;
    • strengthening the capacity of a wide array of sectors to conserve the continent’s grassland biodiversity; and
    • promoting wide public involvement in the conservation, sustainable use, and equitable sharing of benefits of grassland biodiversity.

    “[A grassland] is hundreds, literally hundreds, of species of plants woven together in a complex fabric of interdependencies that extend then to insects, to birds, to a carpet of rodents, to predators, and finally to large mammals, of which humans are but one… A wheat field is nothing more than a clearcut of the grass forest.”
    – Richard Manning, Grassland, 1995

    Just as a forest is more than trees, a grassland is more than grass. But to best appreciate the biodiversity of the grasslands, one must settle in just before sunset and let the creatures go about their business undisturbed. Look up and watch the nighthawks diving for insects, accompanied by that inimitable two-toned hum of the wind across their wings. Enjoy the pronghorn’s proud silhouette on the horizon. Listen to the coyote howls and the wind whispering in the grasses. And watch the deer come down to drink from the precious streams and wetlands scattered throughout this semi-arid region.

    Alberta’s Grassland Natural Region, comprising four natural subregions, covers about 14 percent of Alberta, or about 95,500 km2. About 18 percent of the region is covered with permanent and temporary wetlands, and only 1 to 2 percent is occupied by water in major rivers and shallow lakes. Of what was once native, unploughed prairie in Alberta, only about 43 percent remains, and of the entire Grassland Natural Region, less than 1 percent is protected.

    Native Grasses near Coronation

    Native grasses near Coronation

    Topography

    Grasslands are not as flat as is often thought. Much of the Grasslands Natural Region comprises undulating plains. Hummocky terrain is found in the northern portions, rolling hills in the west, and badlands and exposed bedrock along river valleys. Elevation ranges from 800 m (Dry Mixedgrass Subregion) to 1,525 m (Foothills Fescue Subregion).

    Habitat Types

    Alberta’s grasslands contain grass-covered uplands, lush river valleys, permanent marshes, temporary wetlands, shallow lakes, and sand dunes and plains. This combination of diverse habitats supports a wide diversity of life, each species adapted to its own specialized niche.

    Cliff Swallows along the Milk River

    Cliff Swallow nests along the Milk River (H. Unger)

    Wildlife

    The Grasslands Natural Region is known for its high concentration of species listed as Special Concern, Threatened, Extirpated, or Endangered by Canada’s Species at Risk Act. The October 2008 joint federal-provincial hearing for EnCana’s proposed infill project in the Suffield National Wildlife Area brought attention to several of those species, including the Ord’s kangaroo rat, the Sprague’s pipit, and three endangered prairie plants.

    Alberta’s grasslands contain many animal species found nowhere else in Alberta, including swift fox, great plains toad, several species of tiger beetle, yucca moth, and mountain plover. The dunes near Blindloss are home for the most northerly population of Ord’s kangaroo rat. Living at the edge of its habitat makes this species particularly vulnerable.

    Plants

    About 25 percent of Alberta’s rare vascular plant species occur in the Grasslands Region, and about 55 rare species occur in Alberta only in the grasslands. Trees and shrubs grow only along rivers and streams, and in terrain that is protected from the desiccating winds and hot summer sun.

    As one moves north and west from the semi-arid, largely native prairie of southeastern Alberta, moisture increases and the land merges with extensively cultivated prairie areas – most of the native biodiversity has been lost in these areas.

    Dry Mixedgrass Natural Subregion

    • “Mixedgrass” refers to the mixture of short and mid-height grasses. The most widespread grasses in this subregion are blue grama, needle-and-thread, June grass, and western wheat grass. In spring and summer, many species of wildflowers are sprinkled among the grasses.
    • Shrubs include silver sagebrush, silverberry (also known as wolf willow), buckbrush, and prickly rose.
    • Along river valleys, tall forest and shrub communities thrive, including plains cottonwood, willow, and thorny buffaloberry.

    Mixedgrass Natural Subregion

    • Climate is similar to the Dry Mixedgrass Subregion, with slightly cooler and moister conditions.
    • Dry, sandy sites contain needle-and-thread grass, northern wheatgrass, sand grass, and June grass. On moister soils, blue grama grass, needle grasses and northern wheat grass thrive.
    • Species on the slopes of the Cypress Hills include plains rough fescue, western porcupine grass, and sedges.
    • Ravines, coulees, and other sheltered areas provide habitat for shrubs, including buckbrush, silver sagebrush, silverberry, and prickly rose.
    • Tree species include plains and narrowleaf cottonwood and balsam poplar along the Oldman River, and balsam poplar in the Cypress Hills.

    Northern Fescue Natural Subregion

    • Vegetation is transitional between prairie and parkland, showing characteristics of both regions
    • Dominated by plains rough fescue, Alberta’s provincial grass
    • Grasses on the driest sites include blue grama, northern wheat grass, sand grass, and June grass. Moister sites contain western porcupine grass, plains rough fescue, northern wheatgrass, and porcupine grass.
    • Other plant species include balsam poplar, aspen, plains cottonwood, willow, sedge, bulrush, and common cattail.

    Foothills Fescue Natural Subregion

    • This subregion is characterized by cooler summers, a shorter growing season, warmer winters, and more precipitation than the other three subregions.
    • Herbaceous plants are diverse, including species not common in other subregions, such as sticky purple geranium and silvery perennial lupine.
    • The prevalence of mountain rough fescue, Parry oat grass, and bluebunch fescue distinguish this subregion from the others.
    Sage Bush, Middle Sand Hills

    Sage bush, Middle Sand Hills (A. Teucher)

    Land Use

    Agriculture is the principal land use in the Dry Mixedgrass Subregion, with grazing occurring over about 55 percent of the area and dryland farming (crops, fallow) taking up about 35 percent. Nearly 10 percent is under irrigation, and oil and gas activity is extensive throughout the region.

    The Mixedgrass Subregion is the most intensively cultivated subregion in Alberta – 85 percent of the region is planted to annual crops. About 5 percent of the subregion is under irrigation. Oil and gas development is common throughout this area.

    In the Northern Fescue and Foothills Fescue Subregions, agriculture is the primary use of the area, including both annual cultivation and grazing. Other uses include significant oil and gas activity, mining, and outdoor recreation, including motorized vehicle use.

    Pakowki Lake Dunes

    Pakowki Lake dunes (C. Wershler)

    “There are people who think of the prairie as boring, and it’s hard not to pity them.”
    – Candace Savage, Prairie: A Natural History

    February 2014

    AWA hears nothing its efforts to get protected status for Onefour. AWA continues to push the Government of Canada to maintain the lands in their inventory until they have decided they are needed to meet several species at risk recovery plans. AWA has also approached Alberta to ensure the land receives protected status under the South Saskatchewan Regional Plan. Though both levels of government have acknowledged the land’s importance for species at risk no specifics have been forthcoming from either.

     October, 2013

    The Draft South Saskatchewan Regional Plan is officially unveiled. The draft does not address conservation in native grasslands in any specific way; no legislated protection is proposed for grassland areas despite the large number of species at risk in southeast Alberta. AWA argues that Milk River Ridge, Wild Horse Plains and key stretches of wild rivers in the south should be legislatively designated as Heritage Rangelands.

     September 2013

    AWA learns that sensitive rough fescue and mixed grasslands on the Milk River Ridge are being opened up to exploration activity in the Alberta Bakken oil play. At the same time, efforts to secure legal designation for these lands are being delayed until the Government of Alberta releases its South Saskatchewan Region Plan (SSRP). This comes despite the fact that, in February 2011, the South Saskatchewan Regional Advisory Council (RAC) recommended the Milk River Ridge west of the town of Milk River, adjacent to the Twin River Heritage Rangeland, as a “Candidate Conservation Management Area”.

     March 4, 2013

    AWA meets with 34 Manyberries area landowners and lease holders to discuss issues affecting grassland species and ranching communities.  The meeting is the beginning of a Sage-grouse Partnership.

     November 2012

    The federal government denies approval of Cenovus’ (previously EnCana) proposal to drill 1,275 natural gas wells and construct associated infrastructure in the Suffield National Wildlife Area. The Government agreed with the Joint Review Panel’s 2009 conclusion that the proposed project would result in significant adverse effects on certain species at risk and would interfere with the conservation of wildlife.

     Sept 2012

    Another 14,000 acres of public land in southern Alberta is transferred to municipalities with no public discussion.

     June 2012

    2012 spring sage-grouse population counts are released. With only 13 males recorded at Alberta leks, sage-grouse continue to hang on by a thread in the province. Only 18 males were counted at Saskatchewan leks, a dramatic decrease from the 42 males last recorded.

     June 2012

    State of Canada’s Birds report published by Environment Canada on behalf of the North American Bird Conservation Initiative.  Of particular concern, it reveals that populations of grasslands birds have declined by 45% on average since 1970. January 2012 AWA submits its  comments on the draft land-use planning recommendations from the South Saskatchewan Regional Advisory Council. “AWA believes there are many positive elements to the recommendations of the South Saskatchewan Regional Advisory Council… But the recommendations also contain many inconsistencies and shortcomings; factors that will need to be urgently addressed before any final Regional Plan is developed.”

     2012

    The on-again-off-again consultation process for the South Saskatchewan region is restarted and stalled again in 2012. Political leadership campaigns and a provincial election stall the promised public consultation on the draft recommendations of the South Saskatchewan Regional Advisory Council.

     November 2011

    The future for the planning process for the South Saskatchewan Region is unclear. Though the “public sessions” promised for Fall 2011 have been suspended, the December 19 date for public comment on the recommendations from the Regional Advisory Council appears to remain in place.

     October 2011

    New Premier Alison Redford makes good on her leadership campaign promise and scraps the proposed Potatogate public land sale. A short Government of Alberta news release, October 19, 2011, announces: “Government canceled the RFP after people expressed concerns that there was no public input into using a Request for Proposals and that there might be an impact on water and on the ranching community.” AWA is quick to congratulate the premier on her decision. Now a process is needed to ensure that future ‘Potatogate’ land sales are not allowed to go ahead.

     September 2011

    AWA hosts an Emergency Sage-Grouse Summit, September 7 and 8, 2011. Leading international sage-grouse scientists, environmentalists and landowners gather together to plan what emergency action is needed to recover sage-grouse in Alberta before it is too late. The summit results in a communiqué, published September 8, which lays out recommendations from sage-grouse recovery. Recommended actions include :

    • Designate additional critical habitat as identified on proposed critical habitat maps produced in 2010.
    • No new developments in critical greater sage-grouse habitat. Major concerns are regarding prolonged or expanded industrial development and associated activities in and around critical habitat.
    • Restore existing critical habitat, including removal of industrial infrastructure. To allow for future recovery, previously occupied range outside current critical habitat must be restored to functionality suitable for greater sage-grouse.
    • Any new development outside of critical habitat but within the identified zone of influence (15 kilometres) must not contribute to the disturbance of the species or destruction of critical habitat.

     September 2011

    Alison Redford, candidate for the leadership of the provincial Progressive Conservative party, expresses her opposition to the Potatogate public land sale. In a September 29 email, Redford’s campaign advisor wrote: “As Premier, Alison will… Suspend the sale of 16,000 acres of ecologically sensitive crown land near Bow Island and wait for the South Saskatchewan Basin Regional Advisory Council to present its final report on the best use of that parcel.”

     August 31, 2011

    In a startling move, the Alberta government announces that the notorious ‘Potatogate” public sale is back on, despite the extensive outpouring of public opposition to the deal. Bids are invited to buy the land, including a requirement that at least half the land must be ploughed up. AWA reiterates its fundamental objection to the proposed land sale, and, once again, hundreds of Albertans begin to write to the government to express their opposition.

     August 4, 2011

    AWA, Alberta Native Plant Council and Nature Alberta publish a document, Sale of Public Land in Alberta: Recommendations for Improving Regulation, Policy and Procedures. Recommendations in the report include :

    • The long‐term interest of all Albertans is best served by retaining public lands as a trust held by government for conservation purposes.
    • Protective notations should be applied to public lands in large blocks of prairie, Environmentally Significant Areas, and other important habitat areas for at risk species.
    • Regulations are needed that clearly lay out procedures to be used for public land sale or trade and that require public notice and consultation.

     April 2011

    AWA receives 912 pages of documents under Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy legislation which sheds some limited light on the background of the Alberta government’s failed “Potatogate” public land sale. At the time that the deal was being discussed, Senior staff from the government’s own Rangeland and Fish and Wildlife Divisions made it abundantly clear that the application should be rejected, but their opinions were evidently overruled.

    The Fish and Wildlife division had recommended “against the sale of this land due to its high value for species at risk and wildlife, and high ecological value as a large contiguous block of native grassland, a relatively limited resource.” Similarly, a report from SRD’s Rangeland division emphasized “the land is not surplus to our needs as it is currently being used for grazing and recreation. The landscape has high wildlife values and contributes to ecological goods and services of the community… The land is environmentally sensitive and best left in its native state. Taking such a large acreage out of the public land base would have a profound effect on the people who rely on this resource and all the values it provides. (The) recommendation is not to sell it.”

    Ignoring these and other recommendations, the government continued to push ahead with the proposed deal, which was only halted at the eleventh hour due to the huge uprising of public opposition.

     March 2011

    The Alberta government releases its report on the recommendations from the South Saskatchewan Regional Advisory Council (RAC). Surprisingly, a 9-month public consultation process is promised, include public meetings in the fall. Albertans are invited to complete a 78-page ‘workbook’ by December 2011.

     February 2011

    Despite the enormous public opposition to the behind-closed-doors sale of public land proposed in “Potatogate,” the Alberta government continues to dispose of public land with no opportunity for any form of public input. A February 3 2011 Government of Alberta news release states that 84,000 acres of tax recovery land will be sold to a total of 12 different municipalities for the princely sum of $1 per acre. “It is clear from our reading of internal memos on the Potatogate affair that legitimate environmental concerns of SRD Fish and Wildlife and Public Lands staff have not been listened to by decision makers,” says Cliff Wallis, AWA president. “We fear that the same is happening with these transfers.”

     October 2010

    The Foothills Restoration Forum sponsors a wind energy and native prairie field tour and workshop. The workshop follows from another workshop in February 2010 to consider improvements to the Wildlife Guidelines for Alberta Wind Energy Projects (Alberta SRD, 2006). Since then a working group of government, industry, environmental consultants and conservation interests has been compiling background information on policies, principles, guidelines and practices that have been used by other industry sectors to minimize disturbance on native prairie. The document Minimizing Disturbance of Alberta’s Native Prairie by Wind Energy Development is reviewed and discussed.

     September 2010

    In early September 2010, AWA learns that, through a secret government process, 25 sections – or 16,000 acres – of public land is about to be sold to SLM Spud Farms Ltd. The land, near Bow Island, is predominantly native prairie and is known to be home for a number of species listed under the federal Species at Risk Act (including burrowing owl, ferruginous hawk, Sprague’s pipit, chestnut‐collared longspur, McCown’s longspur, short-eared owl, and long‐billed curlew). But despite the importance of this habitat to these species, if the sale goes ahead, the land would be ploughed up and used to grow potatoes.

    AWA launches a public campaign opposing the secretive ‘Potatogate’ land sale, and in an unprecedented outpouring of public opposition, hundreds of Albertans write to the Minister of Sustainable Resource Development to protest the proposed deal. The deal is criticized on a variety of grounds:

    • the lack of any public process for a selling public land to a donor to the PC party;
    • the secretive nature of the sale, the loss of irreplaceable native prairie and endangered species habitat;
    • the water implications for new irrigation in an already over-allocated water basin.

     February 2010

    Alberta Sustainable Resource Development publishes Information Letter IL2010-02, Foothills Fescue Grassland Principles for Minimizing Surface Disturbance.

     January 2009

    The Suffield Joint Review Panel releases its report and recommendation regarding EnCana’s proposed shallow gas infill project. The Panel recommends “that certain key requirements must be met before the proposed project or a variation of it could proceed.” The three requirements are as follows:

    • Critical habitat for two wildlife species at risk, the Ord’s kangaroo rat and the Sprague’s pipit, as well as three plant species at risk, the tiny cryptanthe, the small-flowered sand verbena, and the slender mouse-ear-cress, must be finalized.
    • Once critical habitat is finalized, the proposed project facilities should not be located in the defined critical habitat for these five species, unless otherwise permitted under the Species at Risk Act.
    • The Suffield Environmental Advisory Committee, established under the 1975 Agreement allowing gas production in the present-day National Wildlife Area, is not able to oversee a development of this magnitude at present. Its role must be clarified and it must be resourced adequately by the governments of Canada and Alberta to be able to ensure proper regulatory oversight of the proposed project.

     April 2008

    Federal Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada publishes its assessment for sage-grouse:

    “This large grouse is restricted to sagebrush grasslands in southern Alberta and Saskatchewan and has suffered significant population declines (42% over the last 10 years, 88% since 1988). The number of leks (male display sites) has decreased by 50% in the last 10 years and there are now less than a thousand breeding birds in the population. Causes for the decline are largely due to the loss, fragmentation and degradation of its native grassland habitats through oil and gas exploration, overgrazing and conversion to crops.”

     January 2008

    Federal report, Recovery Strategy for the Greater Sage-Grouse in Canada is published. Includes targets of:

    • “No loss of active Sage-Grouse leks or Sage-Grouse population numbers in any portion of the current Sage-Grouse range in Alberta and Saskatchewan.”
    • “By 2012, improve Sage-Grouse population status and productivity within Alberta and Saskatchewan so that all populations within the current range show a positive trend in the number of strutting males at leks and the number of active leks for the period 2000 to 2012.”

     July 2006

    AWA, Federation of Alberta Naturalists, Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, Nature Canada and Sierra Club of Canada send petition to the federal Minister of the Environment, calling for protection of Tiny cryptanthe and Sand verbena under the Species at Risk Act.

     2006

    Encana proposes the expansion of industrial development into the CFB Suffield National Wildlife Area (NWA). The environmental review process will test the strength of SARA to protect endangered species on federal land, as the area contains 14 federally listed At Risk species. There are also 78 species listed in a 2000 provincial assessment as At Risk or Sensitive in the NWA.

     2005

    EnCana proposes to drill 300 to 400 new shallow sweet natural gas wells each year for the next three years, totaling 1,275 wells, in the Suffield National Wildlife Area. This will result in 16 or more wells per section and 220 kilometres of additional pipeline, doubling the number of wells in this area. This development means significant new infrastructure, including new access roads, water development, areas for disposal of drilling fluids (sumps), and increased compressor capacity.

    In response to this proposal, Canada’s Department of National Defence, as the responsible authority, declares its intention to undertake a comprehensive study and provide opportunities for public participation.

     March 2004

    Northern Plains Conservation Network publishes its ground-breaking report, A Conservation Assessment for the Northern Great Plains. Includes recommendations for “Expanding the amount of land designated as reserves or managed primarily for biodiversity conservation from the current 1.5%,” and “Promoting ecologically sustainable management in both the agricultural and nonagricultural portions of the landscape.”

     2003

    The CFB Suffield National Wildlife Area is formally established. Land-use activities – including resource extraction, agricultural development, and water management projects – will now be subject to approval and mandatory environmental screening.

     December 2002

    AWA publishes a Position Statement on domestic livestock grazing on public lands. “AWA supports continued domestic livestock grazing on public lands in the Grassland and Aspen Parkland Natural Regions, including protected areas, where it is compatible with ecologically-based management objectives…”

     January 2002

    Alberta Energy Utilities Board publishes Information Letter IL2002-01 Principles for Minimizing Surface Disturbance in Native Prairie and Parkland Areas. “Industry should avoid disturbing native prairie… If avoidance is not possible, disturbance should be minimized to whatever degree is absolutely necessary for a project to be constructed or operated safely and successfully.” “Predevelopment planning and design must include analysis of needs to avoid or minimize disturbance to native prairie and parkland.”

     2000

    Assessment and Status Report on the Greater Sage Grouse Centrocercus urophasianus in Canada is published.

    Sage-grouse is now listed as Endangered in Alberta.

     1998

    Report, Status of the Sage Grouse in Alberta, published by Alberta government. The report documents that Alberta’s sage-grouse population has experienced “an 80 percent decline over the past few decades.” Population estimate is pegged at 320 individuals (of both sexes). Declines “are most often attributed to the loss of habitat resulting from human encroachment on native prairie.” Alberta’s sage-grouse “may be near levels that are nonviable.”

    Sage-grouse is designated as Endangered by the federal Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC)

     1996

    Sage-grouse added to Alberta’s “blue” list, as a species that may be at risk in the province, due to declining population numbers (Status of the Sage Grouse in Alberta, 1998).

    Hunting season for sage-grouse is closed in Alberta (there has been an open season on hunting sage-grouse since 1967).

     1991

    Sage-grouse given “yellow” listing in Alberta, as a species of concern in Alberta, due to their naturally low populations and their limited habitat and distribution ion the province (Status of the Sage Grouse in Alberta, 1998). Sage-grouse open hunting season continues.

     June 1990

    The Milk River Management Society is founded, with AWA being one of the founding members. Other members come from local government, the ranching community, other conservation groups, and provincial agencies. The society holds the lease for the Milk River Natural Area and advises on resource use and management of the Milk River Natural Area and Kennedy Coulee Ecological Reserve. The society is also responsible for administering the grazing contract and long-term research monitoring.

     August 25, 1989

    The governments of Alberta and Saskatchewan signed an agreement committing themselves to cooperation on ecosystem management, education and park promotion. Thus the Cypress Hills Interprovincial Park becomes Canada’s first interprovincial park.

     June 4, 1987

    Hon. Don Sparrow, Minister of Forestry, Lands and Wildlife announces the establishment of the Milk River Natural Area—the province’s hundredth natural area.

     1973

    An agreement is signed between the Department of Regional Economic Expansion (DREE) and the Department of National Defense (DND) allowing grazing in the sensitive areas of Suffield.

    The Canada Wildlife Act is passed in order to protect significant wildlife habitat.

     1971

    The Canadian Forces Base Suffield is established as a live fire training area. However, sensitive areas, including the Middle Sand Hills, are declared off-limits to the military.

     1961- 1964, 1968

    The Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Agency operates summer and winter pasture to help alleviate the strain of drought conditions on local ranchers.

     1951

    The Cypress Hills Provincial Park is established in Alberta, encompassing the portion of land known as the Elkwater Block. A warden and an assistant warden are appointed to manage it.

     1947

    The Middle Sand Hills area is transferred to the Canadian Research Board for chemical and biological weapons testing. The specific nature of this activity is classified and any possible effects are not known.

     1942

    Suffield is designated Federal Crown land.

     1941

    A large portion of the area is expropriated by the Dominion Government in order to secure the area as a chemical warfare testing ground for the British, who lost access to lands in Algeria following the German occupation of France.

     1938

    Recovering populations of pronghorns result in the closure of Wawaskesy National Park (House of Commons Bill 154). In this same year, the area is declared unfit for agriculture under Alberta’s Special Areas Act.

     1926-1941

    Drought conditions result in the consolidation of small farms into large ranches.

     1922

    The antelope sanctuary is officially designated Wawaskesy National Park, although this land is also initially used for livestock grazing. When livestock pushes out the population of pronghorns, measures are taken to limit the numbers of livestock.

     1915

    140 km2 of the Middle Sand Hills area is designated as a pronghorn antelope sanctuary.

     1906-1907

    Canadian pronghorn populations are decimated by severe winters. To speed the recovery of pronghorns, refuges are established on federal land in both Alberta and Saskatchewan.

     1900s

    The Canadian government promotes settlement and cultivation on the Canadian plains. A first wave of homesteading occurs in 1911 and 1912, a second wave occurs in 1915, and a third wave begins with the return of World War I veterans in 1919, who are given land under the Solider Settlement Plan. Many homesteads in this area are dry and unsustainable, and are abandoned over time.

     1890

    The last great plains grizzly is shot in the Cypress Hills.

     1880

    Cattlemen begin to settle the area.

     1860-80

    Bison decline rapidly and are virtually exterminated.

     1877

    Blackfoot First Nation signs lands to Dominion of Canada and moves onto reservations.

     1876-1881

    Sitting Bull and his followers escape to the Cypress Hills after the Battle of Little Bighorn.

    1874

    Captain Featherstonhaugh of the British North American Boundary Commission explores the Milk River area.

    1850s & 1860s

    British expedition led by Captain John Palliser explores the Middle Sand Hills area.

      1859

    Captain John Palliser comments that the Cypress Hills are “a perfect oasis in the deserts we have travelled.”

     1805

    The Milk River is named by Captain Meriwether Lewis for its muted colour, similar to the colour of tea with milk.

     1754

    Anthony Henday becomes the first European to traverse the Cypress Hills.

    December 1, 2017

    Wainwright Dunes Wildlife Friendly Fencing

    Wild Lands Advocate update by Carolyn Campbell, Conservation Specialist A pdf version of this article…

    Read more »

    December 1, 2017

    Nose Hill Park: AWA Offers A First Look At An Old Grassland

    Wild Lands Advocate update by Nathan Schmidt, Conservation Specialist A pdf version of this article…

    Read more »

    September 1, 2017

    Pronghorn Antelope Friendly Fencing

    In the shimmering heat of a late August weekend, teams of volunteers moved steadily from…

    Read more »

We simply need that wild country available to us, even if we never do more than drive to its edge and look in. For it can be a means of reassuring ourselves of our sanity as creatures, a part of the geography of hope.
- Wallace Stegner
© 2015, Alberta Wilderness Association. | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Federally Registered Charity Number 118781251RR0001 Website design by Build Studio
Sign Up Today!
*

*

*

*

*

If you would like to receive more in-depth information
on issue from time to time, please click here to sign up

×