Promise & Ambiguity: Reinstating the 1976 Coal Policy
February 9, 2021
On February 8th AWA issued two news releases about reinstating the 1976 Coal Policy – one before Energy Minister Sonya Savage’s news conference, one after. They follow in this post.
News Release #2: The Promise and the Ambiguity in Reinstating the 1976 Coal Policy (3:55 pm)
Few governments and politicians are willing to admit their mistakes. So it was good today to hear Energy Minister Savage say it’s important for a responsible government to “admit when you’ve made a mistake and to fix it. And that’s what we are doing here today.” AWA thanks Minister Savage for taking the podium to admit her government’s mistake in rescinding the 1976 Coal Policy and to declare that “Alberta’s government will reinstate the full 1976 Coal Policy.”
“The Minister’s decision offers some encouragement to believe this may be a good day for Alberta’s lands and waters and for the tens of thousands of Albertans who have opposed that June 2020 decision,” said Ian Urquhart, AWA Conservation Director.
But, some of the Minister’s comments need clarification. Minister Savage said she directed the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) to prohibit mountaintop removal mining. In her news conference the Minister said, with respect to mountain top and open pit coal mining along the Eastern Slopes: “Let me be clear, this will not happen in Alberta.”
AWA wonders what this means for mountain top removal projects that would occur on Category 4 lands, lands unprotected from coal mining by the 1976 policy. “Will Montem Resources’ proposed Chinook project in the Crowsnest Pass,” wondered Urquhart, “be prohibited from applying for AER approval since it is a mountain top mine? Is mountain top removal mining now prohibited on all lands in Alberta, regardless of Category?”
And what does the Minister’s directive about “no mountaintop removal will be permitted” mean for possible projects like Aries and Blackstone west of Rocky Mountain House. Are those open-pit, strip mines classified as “mountaintop removal?”
Furthermore, as was the case for Category 2 lands under the Coal Policy, will Minister Savage entertain requests from coal mining companies for an exemption from that policy? Such an exemption would allow a company to apply to the AER for permission to develop leased Category 2 lands. “Minister Savage should make clear,” said Urquhart, “that she will not allow any exemptions to the Coal Policy’s de facto Category 2 Lands prohibitions.”
Further to AWA’s news release of earlier today, AWA was encouraged to see Minister Savage promise to consult with Albertans about coal mining in Alberta. But, what form will that consultation take? AWA reiterates what we said earlier today – consultation should take place through a review panel of independent experts who will hold public hearings as part of their review. The government must not implement a consultation process designed to lead Albertans to the government’s preferred conclusion.
AWA hopes Minister Savage will accept the following recommendations:
“Tens of thousands of Albertans called on the Kenney government to reinstate the Coal Policy,” said Urquhart. “The Minister’s news conference offers some hope that the government will take the consultative, legislative, and regulatory measures needed to respond meaningfully to what Albertans have said about a landscape that sits near the heart of the province’s identity.”
News Release #1: Stop Work, Consult: Alberta Needs Public Hearings on the Future of Alberta’s Eastern Slopes (10:55 am)
Last week, Premier Kenney’s Director of Strategic Planning was reported to have written that some of the strip-mining restrictions in the 1976 Coal Policy “will be restored.” Alberta Wilderness Association wants to be encouraged by this news. AWA hopes the firestorm of opposition the Kenney government has faced over rescinding that policy has convinced the government to restore restrictions. To that end, the Energy Minister should:
Furthermore, the Premier should:
“Tens of thousands of Albertans are calling on the Kenney government to reinstate the Coal Policy,” said Ian Urquhart, AWA Conservation Director. “The Premier must take those concerns seriously and propose consultative, legislative, and regulatory measures to respond meaningfully to what Albertans have said about a landscape that sits near the heart of the province’s identity.”
The public record shows clearly that Alberta only consulted with the coal mining industry about its decision to rescind the Coal Policy. The province currently is in court arguing that, since the Coal Policy wasn’t a law, “it can be rescinded unilaterally by Alberta Energy at any time.” AWA and a host of parties have applied to intervene in that case. A common thread joins all parties together – government had a duty to consult and failed to carry it out.
Establishing an expert review panel with public hearings would show that the government recognizes the need to consult seriously and broadly with Albertans about the future of one of Alberta’s most cherished landscapes. “Metallurgical coal has rested in Alberta’s Eastern Slopes for millennia,” said Urquhart. “It can continue to rest there, undisturbed, while a provincial review panel carefully studies all ramifications of what the possibility of inviting coal companies to the Eastern Slopes will mean.”
For more information:
Dr. Ian Urquhart
AWA Conservation Director