April 1, 2003
Conservation is Best Economic Option for Cardinal Divide – Cheviot Mine Area
Wild Lands Advocate article, April 2003, by Shirley Bray. AWA has maintained for years that…
AWA believes that energy exploration and development must be regulated in a manner that is consistent with the maintenance of wilderness values.
AWA’s mandate throughout its four decades has been the protection of intact, representative ecosystems across Alberta. In areas where economic development is integrated within a working landscape, AWA supports robust management, regulation, and enforcement strategies.
We believe in a fundamental need for wilderness that is free of industrial incursion; a network of legislated protected areas is currently the only framework under which this can be ensured. Outside of such areas, exploration and development must be conducted in an environmentally responsible manner. Full-field life-cycle planning must be required for all new developments including phase-out, remediation, and reclamation. Adequate reclamation liability must be assessed on a per-project basis that accounts for all remediation and reclamation costs, and does not leave Albertans vulnerable to major financial risks.
AWA believes Alberta’s wilderness and natural capital are non-renewable resources of immeasurable value, and must be considered as such and given priority in land-use planning. An overarching land-use plan is desperately needed in Alberta to set targets for all sectors, determine thresholds and establish priorities for land use throughout the province. Conservation areas must be designated with legal protection.
When considering land disturbance impacts, the cumulative footprint of all past, present and planned developments upon the landscape must be considered. Energy development does not take place in isolation: it occurs on a landscape also impacted by forestry, residential and recreational developments. The combined footprint of all of these activities must be considered in planning decisions.
Collectively, we know that the economic value of the ecosystem services performed by natural ecosystems for humankind far exceeds that of industrial development.
April 1, 2003
Wild Lands Advocate article, April 2003, by Shirley Bray. AWA has maintained for years that…
February 1, 2003
Wild Lands Advocate article, April 2004, by Philip Clement. Since our last Cheviot update, the…
December 1, 2002
Enviroline article, December 2002, by Mark Lowey. A revised plan for the controversial Cheviot coal…
December 1, 2002
Wild Lands Advocate update, December 2002, by Philip Clement. Cardinal River Coals is keeping us…
September 13, 2002
September 2002 submission from the Friends of the Peace, including AWA, CPAWS and the Peace…
August 1, 2002
Wild Lands Advocate 10(4): 8-14, August 2002 by Dr. Richard G. Thomas 200208_AR_ML.pdf
April 8, 2002
News release by AWA, Pembina Institute and Toxics Watch Society. “Environmental public interest groups charge…
April 1, 2002
Wild Lands Advocate article, April 2002, by Dale L.Watson 200204_AR_WAT2.pdf
April 1, 2002
Wild Lands Advocate article, April 2002, by Cliff Wallis 200204_AR_MD.pdf
February 15, 2002
Preliminary feasibility study prepared by Golder Associates, submitted to Alberta Environment and Saskatchewan Water Corporation…
February 1, 2002
Wild Lands Advocate article, February 2002, by K.E. Bray 200202_AR_WAT1.pdf
December 1, 2001
Wild Lands Advocate article, October 2001, by Shirley Bray 200110_AR_MD.pdf