Energy - Alberta Wilderness Association

We believe in a fundamental need for wilderness that is free of industrial incursion; a network of legislated protected areas is currently the only framework under which this can be ensured. Outside of such areas, exploration and development must be conducted in an environmentally responsible manner. Full-field life-cycle planning must be required for all new developments including phase-out, remediation, and reclamation. Adequate reclamation liability must be assessed on a per-project basis that accounts for all remediation and reclamation costs, and does not leave Albertans vulnerable to major financial risks.

AWA believes Alberta’s wilderness and natural capital are non-renewable resources of immeasurable value, and must be considered as such and given priority in land-use planning. An overarching land-use plan is desperately needed in Alberta to set targets for all sectors, determine thresholds and establish priorities for land use throughout the province. Conservation areas must be designated with legal protection.

When considering land disturbance impacts, the cumulative footprint of all past, present and planned developments upon the landscape must be considered. Energy development does not take place in isolation: it occurs on a landscape also impacted by forestry, residential and recreational developments. The combined footprint of all of these activities must be considered in planning decisions.

Collectively, we know that the economic value of the ecosystem services performed by natural ecosystems for humankind far exceeds that of industrial development.

AWA has been involved with Shell Canada as they work to restore landscapes once active with drilling and extraction; Waterton 12 is one such site (shown above). (N. Douglas)

Seen in the photo are AWA and Shell Canada employees discussing the process and early results of reclamation efforts at this site that has reached its full life-cycle. (C. Olson)

August 29, 2003

Application Nos. 1276521 And 1276489 Polaris Resources Ltd.

Submission by Alberta Wilderness Association to the EUB’s hearing into a sour gas application in…

May 3, 2003

Is Oil and Gas Development and Conservation of Rough Fescue Prairie Possible?

Speaking notes from a presentation by Cheryl Bradley to a conference of the Alberta Native…

Oil and Gas

May 1, 2003

AWA believes that energy exploration and development must be regulated in a manner that is consistent with the maintenance of wilderness values.

Application Nos. 1276521 And 1276489 Polaris Resources Ltd.

Is Oil and Gas Development and Conservation of Rough Fescue Prairie Possible?

Cypress Hills Fringe Area Structure Plan

Conservation is Best Economic Option for Cardinal Divide – Cheviot Mine Area

Dunvegan Weir Turned Down By EUB/NRCB

Conservation is Best Economic Option for Cardinal Divide – Cheviot Mine Area

EUB Requires Environmental Impact Information for Revised Cheviot Mine Proposal

Battle Lines Drawn Over New Cheviot Mine Proposal

Update on the Cheviot Mine

Dunvegan Hydroelectric Hearing Submission

A Study in Contrasts: The EUB Hearings on the Propsed Fort Hills Oil Sands Project

ENGO News Release: Government Disregards Own Guidelines to Fast-Track Policy Review